H-REAP Design and Deployment Guide – Cisco Learning Read more about controller, lwapp, configuration, wireless, configured and wlans. HReap Design and Deployment Guide: /products_tech_noteashtml Configuring Hybrid REAP. 27, 24, , 2/8/, Wireless LAN IPv6 Client Deployment Guide New! 55, 14, , 6/29/, H-Reap Design and Deployment Guide.
|Published (Last):||28 March 2013|
|PDF File Size:||4.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hi Andrew, Sorry, I missed that post Seems like a refreshing approach. Yes, you should make the configurations identical on both controllers, except for things that must be different like interface IP addresses.
You may be interested in reading my post on that feature matrix as well: Aerohive has an advantage because they were able to ceployment their product without existing product roadmaps and feature sets to support and upgrade along the way. Anonymous December 13, at Andrew vonNagy June 13, at Hi, It is true that the cisco can supports dynamic vlan assignment with hreap configured in local-switching mode?
If you have code version 7. So fail-over is not seamless. Local controller at remote site is dezign controller for the APs at remote site and centrally located controller is secondary controller for the APs at remote site. Andrew vonNagy July deplloyment, at 9: Anonymous June 24, at 2: Here is a link from cisco.
Kristjan, No configuration is replicated between controllers. Ensure the secondary WLC is in the same mobility group, and ideally configured on each AP in the controller preferences.
In this post, I will build on those basic fundamentals and provide more depth on the recommended deployment guidelines if you’re thinking guid deploying H-REAP for remote sites. Because it should already know as it is configured this way before its primary WLC goes offline for some reason. Same mobility group name is configured on the both controllers and we are following HREAP deployment requirements.
What is H-REAP mode?
Why must the latency not exceed 2 seconds v. Hi Andrew Thank you for useful info and I really enjoy reading it.
When we initiate fail-over from primary controller local to secondary controller central with ms or more WAN latency AP fail-over anr fine however when AP gets associated to central controller the clients edsign to the AP gets disconnectes and re-authetication takes place. BJ December 24, at 2: Andrew vonNagy February 7, at 9: Additionally, feature limitations when using this mode of operation need to be clearly understood by network administrators prior to evaluating and deploying an H-REAP solution.
But it’s still fairly manual. First, authentication timers on clients; they expect to have authentication complete within a reasonable amount of time, and if not then they will assume it has failed and try to reconnect and start the authentication process over.
Anonymous March 16, at Curious about your thoughts on the controller-less solution from Aerohive? Should we be expecting seamless fail-over in this scenario? Am I right about that?
Administrators should understand these limitations when architecting a wireless network for remote offices, and may preclude the use of H-REAP if one or more of these features are critical to wireless network service in your organization. Searching high and low for this but yreap not still get my hands on one.
What is H-REAP mode?
And we are noticing the loop in to the network? In versions prior to 7. I can be reached at samuel.
Newer Post Older Post Home. Anonymous August 24, at 7: It is easy to add them to the group on their currently connected controller, gude select each AP from the drop-down list within the H-REAP Group to add them. Anonymous November 15, at 6: Motorola is trying to get their with their WiNG product but will take some time. Anonymous November 16, at 9: That way it’s easier to remain on top of the changes in an incremental fashion, rather than trying to figure out what changed from a year ago and three releases ago: I can be reached at cbagley nmmu.